If time warp existed the their is no god

[admin]

If time warp existed the their is no god why do i say so well, If people can be able to travel back in time or their are parallel worlds to our planet, that means that each person can't have a unique soul.
Think about this say the admin went back in the past and saw him self in front of him (some things happened lol big cuss out) and the past version of the admin destroyed the future admin, it it logical to say that the admin in not dead, and if the past admin still exist that means that both of them must have different souls and would be two different persons when one perishes. Remember if you die right now( GOD forbid) do you really expect that you will rewind back to the past version of you self.

So The future admin will die and can not rewind or his mind or his transfer to past version, if thats so that mean the admin is immortal Reason why you can't believe that is time warp and you believe in god

What you think people lol

 

[RauCous]

Eh? What. I confused. Explain yourself again? I think there can be two instances of one person at the same time it doesn't change much.

 

[admin]

I did not explain my self well it hard to explain.

Yes i agree that their can be two instances of one person at the same time but say one of them dies on the spot who will be the real one.

Think of it like this when they the past and the present person meets at a time warp just they their be some argument between them so their mind will think differently saying something like " your a fake" "i am the real one" and the otehr person a different thing. Their minds will think differently at that time, they are two human beens but the same person.

Lets say the present one dies on the spot what will happen to the past one will he gain the memories of the present one because remember the present one had different experiences. If the past one does not gain the memories of the present one that means that the original person is lost it will not be the same person anymore. You have to put your self in the scenario and you will understand what i'm trying to say

 

[RauCous]

You're throwing causality out the window. Everything that happens either causes something, influences something or is caused or influenced by something. Both instances have the claim of genuineness they both have memories leading up to the point they met each other. The events that shaped them are equally valid. They both represent eventualities from the same origin point. Why should one take precedence over the other?

 

[admin]

but does the present on who has more memories separates him for his past self and in some term makes the present one seem different to the past one

 

[RauCous]

They are different.. Even every smallest unit of time presents some change. We perceive time as continus and our stream of thought for most of us is a contiguous thing. There is no reason to belive that we're the same we always were. I think it's evident that change occurs constantly. Just like the atoms and cells of our body change daily, monthly and yearly (entire pounds of tissuse) the more abstract things like perception, memory and cognitive processes change too. Its just seamless integration from past to future. The change doesn't feel bumpy or drastic. But its there happening. They're individual worlds change them differently but are respectively self consistent.

 

[RauCous]

I still dont understand how individuality or the lack of it disproves God. God is not dependent on the intricacies and idiosyncracies of mankind. One could argue that all mankind are just representations and iteration of one person. That doesn't kill individuality. It's compatible with it. Almost reinforces it.